Judge’s Ruling and Reactions
Cannon, a Trump appointee, ruled that Smith’s appointment violated the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. Legal experts say her decision challenges longstanding precedent, including United States v. Nixon (1974). Trump’s supporters celebrated the decision as a victory, while critics warned it could weaken accountability for top officials. Smith’s office plans to appeal.

Wider Implications
The decision complicates efforts to prosecute Trump, especially with the 2024 election already over and Trump now re-elected. The DOJ also dropped election interference charges against him, following its policy against prosecuting sitting presidents.

What’s Next?
Cannon’s ruling may shape future debates about the limits of presidential power and the role of special counsels. Legal scholars anticipate ongoing appeals and possible legislative action to clarify these constitutional gray areas.